Charles R. Smith
Four days after Palm Sunday, Jesus invited his students to his own
"Going-Away Party," where he offered his Last Will and
Testament. He had been intentional in securing the space and having the
room set up for a memorable occasion. They shared a meal together, and
then he shared with them the bread and the cup.
The flow of today’s worship service has sought to imitate the flow
from the euphoria on Palm Sunday to the gravity of Maundy Thursday. From
the jubilate to the somber. From Palm Sunday to the Last Supper to Jesus’
discourse with the disciples as they sat around the table. Jesus
intimately shared with them that his body would be broken, that the cup
was a new covenant, and that his blood would be shed for them. He told
them that he was going to die, because someone was going to betray him.
They must have wondered how that could happen. Sure, tensions were
mounting. Their minds must have gone to the Pharisees, Chief Priests and
Scribes–the religious elite-who continually were badgering Jesus about
his violations of their understanding of the Law. Those
would be the ones who must be going to kill Jesus. The showdowns that
week certainly must have prompted the disciples to recall the faces of
the self-declared righteous who had hounded Jesus all week.
Yet then Jesus surprised them by telling them that the betrayer was
actually sitting at the table. What? Minds began to race in a variety of
directions. Some thoughts certainly were, "You’ve got to be
kidding! We’ve given up everything-left our steady employment to
depend upon others for our sustenance. We’ve left our homes and
families to follow this itinerant teacher around the countryside, and
now someone who has already made that kind of sacrifice is going to betray
Jesus?" It was hard for this tight band of students to believe that
the betrayal could come from within their own ranks. Other thoughts
could have been, "Sure, I may have rolled my eyes when Jesus said
to turn the other cheek after someone has hit me, but I would never
dream of betraying him. Sure, I discounted his assertion that we should
forgive our enemies seventy times seven, because I simply cannot fathom
extending that kind of grace to people who have harmed me. Ok, Jesus has
taught us not to fear people who can destroy the body, but instead to
fear the One who has the power to throw me into hell, but I’ve got to
confess that I am fearful of these religious zealots and what they might
do to me, but I would never think of betraying him!"
They began wondering and questioning each other as to the identity of
the betrayer. "Is it you Matthew? After all, before becoming a
disciple you were an employee of the Roman government. Maybe you’ve
been a spy all along."
"Simon Peter, are you the betrayer? We have all witnessed how
impetuous you can be that you seemingly do not have any filters, that
whatever comes to your mind comes directly out of your mouth without
thinking how it might sound or without giving thought as to its
implications."
"Simon the Zealot, is it you? We all know that you were a
revolutionary and were in a movement to overthrow the Roman
government."
"Could it be extraverted Andrew, the People Person, the one who
continues to bring people to Jesus? Perhaps he is sore that Jesus did
not respond positively to his extraverted ways."
"James and John, tell us again how you got the nickname ‘Sons
of Thunder?’ Maybe you have been plotting to betray Jesus. We all
remember when your mother actually asked Jesus to allow you to sit on
his right and left when Jesus brought in his new kingdom. Since you
wanted to be General James and Admiral John of Jesus’ new military
regime, perhaps you allowed your quest for power to betray Jesus."
"Maybe it was Thomas; he’s always been a bit of a skeptic,
slow to come around, not always getting it."
"Could the betrayer be Philip? He is another Galilean, and
everybody knows that revolutionaries hide in Galilee. Now that we’re
traveling into Jerusalem, there’s no telling what he might be
thinking."
"Could it be Bartholomew, Thaddeus, or James the Son of Alphaeus?
As introverts, they don’t say much; they just quietly work behind the
scenes. It is doubtful that one of that trio would betray Jesus, but you
know the old saying, "You’ve got to watch the quiet ones."
"Certainly the betrayer is not Judas, because he is the most
trustworthy of our bunch. After all, we trusted him so much, we elected
him treasurer. With his education, respect, and skill, surely, the
betrayer is not Judas."
The disciples then began to contrast themselves against their
colleagues. "I would never do that; they’re not as committed as
me; I am a bit better than they are" were the sentiments criss-crossing
the table. ‘Who is the greatest’ wasn’t necessarily a popularity
contest; instead they were weighing their perception of themselves
against their perception of the others against the backdrop of the
circumstance.
Jesus told them that the greatest was not based on how powerful,
successful or wealthy; the person called great by Jesus would be the one
who served others. They were reminded not to serve like the rulers of
the world who exercise power over others; instead they were to serve
others with a humility that denotes equality. Jesus had served them
around the table, and he had treated them as equals; that is the kind of
service Jesus desires.
Jesus’ comments addressed the group; sure, all twelve sat at the
table, but no one was singled out . . . until a comment to Simon. Did
you notice that Jesus did not call him Peter, the name which Jesus had
given him to symbolize his rock-solid faith? Jesus expressed concern
directly to Simon that he hang in there. Again, Simon, as was his
trademark, declared impulsively, "I’ll follow you all the way to
the end."
Jesus indicated that before sunrise when the rooster crowed, Simon
would deny him not once . . . not twice . . . but three times. And
because our blessings include a printed Bible, we know that Jesus’
prediction came true.
So these were the ones whom Jesus chose to be his students,
the ones in whom he invested three years in hopes that they would/could
continue his mission. These were the ones he deliberately invited to his
"Going-Away Party"; these were the ones to whom Jesus offered
his Last Will and Testament. And these were the ones whom Jesus served,
even though he knew what was going to happen. With the knowledge of
betrayal, bickering, and denial, Jesus still served Judas, Simon Peter
and the rest of the disciples.
On Friday evening, our church began our participation in A Night’s
Welcome, a ministry which houses and feeds homeless people for a week.
We are having opportunities not only to serve but to eat
with a variety of people from a variety of backgrounds. We think most of
our guests are very different from us because of their homelessness, yet
in the eyes of Jesus, we are all the same. We are all God’s children.
Would Jesus eat with you and me? Absolutely, even though we will
betray him after all he has done for us, even though we will argue with
fellow believers, even though we may claim to follow ardently knowing
that we will fail at some of the most critical times. And if Jesus would
choose to eat with you and me, we should honor Jesus by following his
example in offering grace to everyone.
With whom are you eating? Only the people who are like you,
those who can help you, those with whom you agree? Should we eat with
those who are weak, eager to betray us, selfish, ready to knife us in
the back, those whom we can’t trust? The pattern exhibited on his last
night on earth showed Jesus not only eating, but serving those
who were to fail him. And remember, Jesus’ choice to eat his last meal
with his disciples was a deliberate act; knowing that all of them
would be leaving him, he still served them dinner and ate with them.
These were also the ones for whom Jesus died. Jesus ate with those who
would disappoint him, and he served them as equals. With whom will we
eat this week? Will we follow the example of the disciples and wonder if
we are better than those around the table? Because Jesus would
eat with you and me, we should also be breaking bread with . . .
everyone, no matter what.